Methodological Consensus Diseases Consensus State of the Art of Related Disciplines
Methodological Consensus
> Introduction
> Expert Clinical Group
> Objectives
> Methodology
> Workflow
> Evidence Based Methodology
> Consensus statement
> General instructions
> Conflicting points
> Voting Results

Conflicting Points

1. Eligibility
V. Verwaal

Curriculum Vitae
2. Pre-operative work-up
T.D. Yan

Curriculum Vitae
3.Intraoperative staging system
A. Gomez Portilla

Curriculum Vitae
4.Technical aspects of the cytoreductive surgery
S. O’Dwyer

Curriculum Vitae
5.Residual disease evaluation
S. Moreno Gonzalez

Curriculum Vitae
6A. Hyperthermic Intraoperative Chemotherapy: nomenclature and modality of perfusion
O. Glehen

Curriculum Vitae
6B. Chemotherapies, carrier solution and optimal temperature
D. Elias

Curriculum Vitae
7.Morbidity, toxicity and mortality classification systems
R. Younan

Curriculum Vitae
News
Submit your abstract >
Registration and Accommodation >
Introduction

Dear expert,

Welcome to the consensus area of the web site dedicated to the Workshop.

As an expert, you are kindly invited to access the documents and vote your option.

The process will follow a two step Delphi [1] method as follows: in each document you will find a list of suggested options for each conflicting point.

In the first round of Delphi, you are asked to select the option you believe is the most appropriate for each conflicting point.

In the second round, you will be asked to vote again, having the opportunity to see the previous rating of the other experts.

The results of the Delphi [1] process will be presented and discussed during the Workshop.

Please note that the first round of Delphi [1] regarding the discussion of Methodological aspects of local-regional therapy should be completed within 22/10/2006; the second one within 29/10/2006.

References

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):376-80. Review.

home | back | mail | top | credits